ABOUT US
Federation for a Manufacturing Renaissance
A Summary of The American Manufacturing Renaissance
Act
Cong. Jan Schakowsky is in the process of submitting the American Manufacturing Renaissance Act to the US House of Representatives. This bill will have Cong. Ro Khanna, Cong. Danny Davis and others as co-sponsors. The bill is focused exclusively on supporting programs that promote inclusion in the manufacturing sector at all levels. The bill asks for $20 billion in support of these programs. This bill reflects minor additional points made to HR 5124 that was submitted last session.
1. Renaissance Councils: The bill will support the creation of a new
corporation that will lead to the creation of 30 Manufacturing Renaissance
Councils (MRCs) that will be supported for the following work to design and
implement the following programs.
2. Anchor Institutions: Provide a program of capacity building
and technical assistance to institutions of higher education and local
government to bring together diverse stakeholders who commit sourcing to local
companies whenever possible to generate a predictable demand for local
companies in order to create community wealth building strategies.
3. Create Early Warning Systems: Proactive outreach to companies facing
closure risks to identify short and long-term technical and financial needs.
This outreach would be designed to gather public data and information from
employees and service providers to identify problems that can be solved before
they constitute a crisis. These activities may include:
A. Providing assistance to employers in managing
reductions in force, which may include early identification of firms at risk of
layoffs, and an assessment of the needs of and options for at-risk firms.
B. Funding feasibility studies to determine if the
operations of a company may be sustained through a buyout or other means to
avoid or minimize layoffs.
C. Partnering or contracting with business-focused
organizations to assess risks to companies, propose strategies to address those
risks, implement services, and measure impacts of services delivered.
D. Conducting analyses of the suppliers of an
affected company to assess their risks and vulnerabilities from a potential
closing or shift in production of their major customer.
E. Engaging in proactive measures to identify
opportunities for potential economic transition in growing industry sectors or
expanding businesses.
4. Ownership Succession: Develop acquisition and ownership succession
strategies for firms, firms that are scheduled to be sold or relocated, and
strategically or geographically important firms with a focus on worker
ownership, ownership by black, Indigenous and people of color, and women
ownership. Such strategies may include the following:
A. Technical and business assistance to employers
facing succession risk and research and market analysis on businesses facing
succession risk.
B. Recruitment of private investment capital and
serving as a liaison between firms and potential buyers who commit to maintain
production in the MRC jurisdiction.
C. Training of minority and women business
entrepreneurs and employee ownership groups.
D. Providing financial assistance for employee
ownership conversions.
5. Capital Access: The MRCs will facilitate the development of
publicly owned financial institutions, including publicly owned banks, holding
companies, investment and asset management firms, revolving loan funds, and
insurance pools that share the objectives of the national manufacturing strategy
to support the growth of a robust local manufacturing ecosystem, including the
following:
A. Providing funds for capitalization, start-up and
operational financing, start-up technical and legal assistance and other
services as needed to create, and others at the discretion of the MRC.
B. Working with community development financial
institutions and other local lenders to provide financial products and services
to small and medium manufacturers, for the purposes of facility development,
purchase of new equipment and technology, and expansion to new markets.
C.
Providing grants and loans for commercial real
estate development for business incubators and industrial parks, including
expenses for environmental remediation.
6. Education Programs to close the Skills Gap: Education programs in public prekindergarten,
elementary schools, and secondary schools that focus on creating pathways for people
of color, women, and socially and economically disadvantaged individuals in
manufacturing preparing for careers at all levels with the company, including
production, engineering, product development, management, financial management,
and ownership. Programs must integrate environmental concerns into the
curriculum and activities. Apprenticeship programs will be developed to ensure
an adequate pool of instructors for all aspects of the education infrastructure
ensuring that manufacturing instructors are technologically, culturally, and
pedagogically competent. Resources and training for pedagogically, culturally,
and technologically competent instructors for career education,
pre-apprenticeship, skills training, and community college programs in local
public prekindergarten, elementary schools, and secondary schools.
7. Training Services: Workforce pipeline activities, developed in
coordination with each local workforce development board established in section
107 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3122), that may include any of the
following:
A. Occupational skills training, including training
for nontraditional employment.
B. Programs that combine workplace training with
related instruction.
C. Skill upgrading and retraining.
D. Entrepreneurial training.
E. Adult education and literacy activities,
including activities of English language acquisition and integrated education
and training programs, provided concurrently or in combination with services
described in any of clauses
F. Customized training conducted with a commitment
by an employer or group of employers to employ targeted populations.
G. Paid and unpaid work experiences that have as a
component academic and occupational education, which may include:
1) summer employment opportunities and other
employment opportunities available throughout the school year;
2) pre-apprenticeship programs;
3) internships and job shadowing;
4) youth apprenticeships.
5) Leadership development opportunities, which may
include community service and peer-centered activities encouraging
responsibility and other positive social and civic behaviors, as appropriate
6) supportive services; and
7) adult mentoring.
8) Manufacturing awareness and stem programs
targeting elementary schools and middle schools.
8. Wrap Around Services: Provide grants to local governments and community-based
organizations for supportive services including
A. the provision of direct support services (such
as childcare, transportation, mental health, and substance use disorder
treatment), assistance in obtaining health insurance coverage, and assistance
in accessing the supplemental nutrition assistance program established under
the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.), the special supplemental
nutrition program for women, infants, and children established by section 17 of
the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1786), housing, and other benefits, as
appropriate; and
B.
offering career pathway navigation and case
management services, including providing information and outreach to target
populations to encourage individuals to take part in programs and service
offerings.
C.
Provide non-traditional manufacturing
populations (such as women, Black, Indigenous, and Latino entrepreneurs) with
targeted support through
1)
leadership development programs including
mentoring and affinity groups;
2)
curriculum development for diversity, equity,
and inclusion trainings; and
3)
delivery of free or low-cost equity training and
planning for companies.
9.
Funding and Technical Assistance for
Manufacturing Renaissance Councils: The
Corporation shall provide grants and technical assistance to MRCs in
identifying, monitoring, evaluating, and implementing activities that show
promise towards the goals of the Corporation and the national manufacturing
strategy, as determined by the Board.
Recent Posts
- Construction of Tennessee EV Battery Facility Highlights Promises and Challenges of Biden Administration Policies
- The Success of US Chip Manufacturing Hinges on Our Electric Grid
- ‘Made in USA’ Works Well for Us
- Solidarity First: Building A Movement For Just & Sustainable Economies In Quebec
- Biden’s Manufacturing Boom Is Underway. But The Jobs Haven’t Followed Yet
Archives
Categories
Learn More about the Federation for Manufacturing Renaissance
A nationwide Federation for a Manufacturing Renaissance has been formed with five foundational pillars:
- Shape industrial policy on a national, state, and local level in a way that is profoundly inclusive and anchored in economic democracy, and that is committed to community development. Our policy will reflect “best practices” in domestic and global experience.
- Support the growth and development of projects in local communities that retain and strengthen local manufacturing ecosystems.
- Create a community that learns from and utilizes the talents of its member organizations.
- Educate the broader public as well as policy leaders on the importance of industrial policy and re-building our manufacturing ecosystem.
- Create an international membership that builds strong relationships with projects representing best international practices related to building the global manufacturing ecosystem.
The Federation for a Manufacturing Renaissance (FMR) is committed to development that is economically, environmentally, and socially sustainable and restorative. We believe that a “high road,” inclusive manufacturing ecosystem is fundamental for healthy individuals, families, and communities. Toward this end, we:
- Build partnerships with those who share our values,
- Develop and advocate federal, state and local public policies consistent with our mission, and
- Support the development of programs reflecting this vision on a local and regional level.
A number of organizations have formed the Federation for a Manufacturing Renaissance. The purpose of the Federation is to:
- Educate the broader public as well as policy leaders on the importance of industrial policy and re-building our manufacturing ecosystem.
- Shape industrial policy on a national, state, and local level in a way that is profoundly inclusive and anchored in economic democracy, and that is committed to community development. Our policy will reflect best international experience.
- Support the growth and development of projects in local communities that retain and strengthen local manufacturing ecosystems;
- Create a community that learns from and utilizes the talents of its member organizations; and
- Create an international membership that builds strong relationships with projects representing best international practices related to building the global manufacturing ecosystem.
The public sector including government at all levels, and civil society as represented by the labor movement, community-based organizations, educators, faith-based organizations, the environmental movement and others must play a leading role in retaining, redesigning, and rebuilding our manufacturing sector in partnership with the private sector. Programs focused on inclusion must have the same level of political and financial support as programs focused on new technologies in manufacturing. This ensures that the values of sustainability, justice and restoration guide development and provide public support for building the manufacturing ecosystem.
The United States has experienced a long-term decline in its manufacturing sector with an enormous social, economic, and political impact over the last 50 years. The loss has severely impacted communities throughout the country—urban and rural, white and of color. For the last hundred years, industrial policy has mainly been guided by the private and financial sectors driven by the objective of increasing personal wealth. Manufacturers revolutionized the means of production. They were committed to long-term planning. US manufacturing was known for its innovation. Despite a number of inequities, this industrial policy led to the growth of the middle class and the emergence of the US as the dominant global economy.
By the late 1970s and the emergence of new information technologies, the search for the highest rate of return in the shortest amount of time led to some leaders in the manufacturing and financial sector cannibalizing the very companies that were the heart of the manufacturing sector. Companies closed as investors shifted their financial resources to other sectors. David Roderick, CEO of US Steel closed one of the most profitable steel companies in the world, stating, “I’m in this business to make money, not steel.” Local and state governments were often complicit or passive in engaging the challenges of the manufacturing sector.
In the 1960s, the sector represented more than 27% of GDP. As a result of these practices, manufacturing now represents only 11% of GDP. The country and our communities have suffered in every respect. This reality was a product of industrial policies rather than a “blind market”.
We have launched the Federation for a Manufacturing Renaissance to represent the broad and shared interests of the public and private sectors committed to retaining, redesigning, and rebuilding our manufacturing sector. We are committed to manufacturing, economic democracy, and community development.